MPS BRIEF · JUNE 2026
The report blames enablement. The real gap is who owns the outcome.
By David Morris & Jeff Culliton
3 MIN READ
43% of enterprise AI initiatives are expected to fail. Not because the models are weak. Because the people were never prepped.
That's from HCLTech's new report. 467 leaders, billion-dollar companies, an 18-month clock running on every AI dollar they spend.
The read is right. It's also incomplete.
Watch what happens to "prep the people" once it enters a real company. It becomes "train the people." Workshops get scheduled. Licenses get bought. A certification path shows up in the LMS. Someone stands up a dashboard to track adoption. All of it real, all of it useful, and none of it answering the one question that decides whether the initiative survives contact with the business:
Who owns the outcome it was supposed to produce?
Usually no one. The AI got handed to IT to stand up, to a center of excellence to evangelize, to a steering committee to bless. Plenty of custody. No ownership. Custody keeps the thing running. Ownership is the person whose number moves, or doesn't.
So the pilot works. The demo lands. Leadership nods. Then it stalls just past the pilot, because the first time it demands a hard call â kill this step, reassign this team, absorb a short-term dip â there's no one with both the authority and the accountability to make it.
That's not an enablement gap. It's an operating-model gap. And you can't train your way out of a structure problem. A trained team with no owner just reaches the dead end faster, with better tooling.
Here's the part the 18-month crowd won't like: ownership is the cheap fix. It's a decision, not a budget line. You could name an owner this week. The reason most companies don't is that naming one puts a real person on the hook in public, and that conversation is harder than approving another round of training.
Foundation first. Then deploy.
So before the next rollout, the question isn't whether your people are ready. It's whether anyone owns the outcome by name â and whether the org chart actually lets them make the calls that owning it requires.
AUTHOR
David Morris
david@mpscoremethod.com
AUTHOR
Jeff Culliton
jeff@mpscoremethod.com
MPS works with growth-stage CEOs and PE-backed operators on the operating model under the AI initiative â including the hardest part: naming who owns the outcome. If your next rollout doesn't have an owner by name, that's the conversation worth having.
Start a conversation â© MPS · 2026 · THE MPS CORE METHODâ¢